William Brooks San Antonio — The Attorney Who Stayed Silent

At the heart of the Brad Croft case stands William Brooks—a paid co-counsel with full access to discovery and deep legal obligations, yet whose silence became his most damning act.

Here’s what the public record now confirms:

- Brooks drafted a subpoena to Midlothian PD—but when Fred Olivares used FBI channels to find that Wes Keeling was Brady-listed, the subpoena was buried and never served.

- Years later, Brooks echoed the false cover story in his bar response: that Croft was supposed to deliver the subpoena himself. That claim is impossible—Croft was under strict house arrest, barred from travel, and had already paid over $120,000 for legal services.

- FOIA documents later revealed Keeling's Brady status existed *before trial*, proving the prosecution knowingly relied on a compromised witness while the defense concealed the facts.

This was no minor oversight—it was a systemic failure. Brooks had both the duty and the opportunity to challenge it, yet said nothing. That silence is now part of the public record—and the case is far from over.

Read the full breakdown:

👉 [William Brooks — San Antonio: The Attorney Who Stayed Silent](https://www.universalk9inc.com/william-brooks-san-antonio-the-attorney-who-stayed-silent/)