Thomas McHugh San Antonio | Conflict of Interest in the Brad Croft Case

Thomas McHugh once served as a federal prosecutor in San Antonio, but later crossed over to represent Brad Croft as defense counsel. Instead of protecting his client’s constitutional rights, McHugh oversaw a defense poisoned by conflicts of interest and concealed evidence.

Here’s what the record now shows:

- McHugh allowed Fred Olivares — a *former but not former FBI agent* who helped open the case against Croft — to serve as Croft’s private investigator.

- This created an undisclosed **structural conflict**, giving the government inside access to the defense.

- William Brooks drafted a subpoena to Midlothian PD, but before it was served Olivares used FBI contacts, discovered **Wes Keeling was Brady listed**, and the subpoena was buried.

- Years later, Olivares filed an affidavit — echoed in Brooks’s bar response — falsely claiming Croft was supposed to deliver the subpoena himself. That was impossible: Croft was on strict house arrest, more than 300 miles away, and had already paid over $120,000 for his legal team to handle subpoenas.

- FOIA documents later confirmed Keeling’s Brady status existed *before* trial, proving the government knowingly used a compromised witness while the defense concealed the truth.

This is not speculation — it is documented in affidavits, FOIA responses, and filings now before the court.

Read the full breakdown here:

👉 [Thomas McHugh — Conflict of Interest](https://www.universalk9inc.com/thomas-mchugh-conflict-of-interest/)